Embarrassing Month for American Media Culminates in Jackson Memorial

Today is a dark day for the American press. Weeks of covering Iran, health care and Honduras have now culminated in 24/7 coverage of the Michael Jackson Memorial.

Perhaps it’s for the best. Every major story the press has touched recently has been handled without objectivity or significant analysis.

First, the press covered the Iranian elections as a legitimate democratic exercise in a republican nation. CNN gave hours of coverage to the elections in the “Islamic Republic” and reported on “voter fraud.”

In reality, the Iranian elections are sham plebiscites with absolutely no effect on the Iranian government and the Ayatollah who controls the Persian theocratic dictatorship that the mainstream media has continuously insisted on calling the “Islamic Republic.”

In the midst of this sham coverage of a sham election, President Obama planted a question in a press conference and although Dana Milbank wrote at length about this outrage, the rest of the press basically took it lying down.

No outcry, no boycott of the press briefings and certainly no meaningful coverage of Obama’s blatant transgression against the freedom and independence of the press.

On the heels of this failure, the press entered into orgiastic coverage of Michael Jackson’s death on June 25th. The breaking news that went on for hours, the banal musings of Larry King and the absolutely self-serving live coverage from Neverland Ranch that defined the media’s treatment of Jackson’s death can only be described as shameful.

But it gets worse. Coverage of Jackson’s death was briefly overtaken by the American media’s coverage of the “coup” in Honduras on June 26^th. Knowing little about Manuel Zelaya and apparently unwilling to delve deep and learn more, the American media lambasted the Honduran military as having overthrown the legitimate democratic government of Honduras.

They barely mentioned though that this democratically elected president was going forward with an illegal plan to remove term limits and become a socialist dictator in the vein of Hugo Chavez.

So here we have a string of four failures on the part of the American press. They’ve editorialized inappropriately and without sufficient information on international events, refused to stand up to the Obama Administration when their independence was threatened and devoted almost 24/7 coverage to the death of a man who (Congressman Peter King pointed out) none of us would leave in a room alone with children.

It culminated today in constant coverage Jackson’s memorial including live footage of his family driving to lunch. I’m tired of this ridiculous coverage and I’m tired of the mainstream media’s sham priorities.

Honduran Liberty Preserved

The Obama Administration and their socialist allies in Central America attempted regime change yesterday when Manuel Zelaya, the ousted president of Honduras, boarded a Venezuelan plane in Washington and tried to land in his former country.

Thankfully, the interim government prevented Zelaya’s return and managed to protect their nation’s constitution for one more day from the designs of Latin autocrats and their Washington sycophants.

But as proud as I am of the actions taken by the Honduran military, I am daily filled with shame by the actions of Obama, a man I voted for. To allow a Venezuelan plane to take off from Washington and travel to Honduras to effect regime change is despicable.

Obama has consistently made himself and now our capital a tool of Chavez’s dictatorial foreign policy. The man who did nothing to topple the theocratic totalitarian government in Tehran is now doing his best to thwart the liberty of 7.5 million Hondurans.

Obama’s foreign policy and his specific handling of the Honduran crisis constitutes a radical departure from the founding ethos of this nation that America must serve as a beacon of liberty to the rest of the world.

In Defense of Honduras

The Honduran military should be congratulated on its recent action in deposing a want-to-be dictator and enforcing the will of the Honduran congress and Supreme Court. By expelling former president Manuel Zelaya from the country, the Honduran military acted in the interest of the citizenry’s liberty and the preservation of the nation’s constitution.

At the time of his expulsion, Zelaya, a close ally of Hugo Chavez, was moving forward with an illegal plebiscite to change the constitution and allow himself to serve another term. He had already disobeyed the ruling of the Supreme Court and fired the head of the military for refusing to enact his illegal orders.

For these reasons, the Supreme Court ordered his ouster.

But President Obama, who took so long to condemn the brutality of the Iranian dictatorship, swiftly spoke out against Zelaya’s ouster calling it an illegal coup and said, “We always want to stand with democracy.”

But President Obama has rarely stood with democracy in his short time in office. He has pressed for closer relations with Cuba, continued to refer to the Iranian theocratic dictatorship as a republic and now he is courageously supporting a close ally of Chavez’s in Honduras.

What’s worse is that Obama is not alone in his hypocrisy. The Organization of American States that most recently lifted a ban on Cuba’s participation in the organization is now supporting Zelaya.

They have condemned the Honduran military’s actions as antidemocratic and are threatening to suspend Honduras from the organization if they don’t reinstate Zelaya. Similarly, the United Nations General Assembly voted to deny recognition to any government but that of Zelaya.

Obama and the world community have revealed themselves as the morally bankrupt puppets of dictatorships and strongmen. Too afraid to stand up to Iran, Cuba or Venezuela, the international community and Obama have instead assaulted the legitimate Honduran government.

But while Obama and the world community condemn the Honduran military for taking part in a coup, I celebrate their actions as safeguarding the liberty of a nation on the brink of socialist dictatorship.